A bitter High Court dispute has damaged out among future neighbours in excess of the development of a wall at a coastal internet site in a north Dublin suburb, a situation which has captivated countrywide interest adhering to an Irish Situations report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres on a proposed household dwelling at Sutton Strand, exactly where allegations of arranging breaches, environmental problems, and long-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled into the courts. The Irish Instances report about René Collier plus the Irish Situations article about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what began as an area disagreement has progressed right into a remarkably publicised lawful fight.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing in excess of development performs at the internet site on Dublin Highway, Sutton, wherever Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a physician and a business director respectively, find to create their loved ones residence. The case happens to be emblematic of broader disputes along Ireland’s coastline, where by progress pressures collide with environmental protections along with the sensitivities of proven residents. In accordance with the Irish Moments report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall getting built by their future neighbours goes over and above the boundaries permitted below planning permission.
René Collier and Paul Feely, each inhabitants of Dublin Road, declare that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the terms in their preparing authorization by building a wall outside of the boundaries in their internet site, leading to an encroachment on the Special Spot of Conservation. The SAC designation is central towards the dispute, as a result areas are subject matter to stringent controls underneath European and Irish environmental law. Within their court docket filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even small encroachments could have Long lasting ecological effects, notably inside of a sensitive coastal setting such as Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny They may be in breach in their scheduling permission, and say the wall, which can be partially designed, is in the proper position. Their legal group has characterised the action as an try to delay or frustrate a lawful growth. The few accuse litigants of trying to get to halt homebuilding as a way to protect their check out, an allegation that's been repeated in court and referenced in coverage of the case. This accusation goes to the guts of numerous coastal scheduling disputes, where sights of The ocean are both equally remarkably prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Situations report naming René Collier and Paul Feely explained spectacular initiatives with the plaintiffs to document the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded by means of ocean in storm to photograph the website, In accordance with sworn evidence referenced in the Irish Times. In a single account, Rene Collier waded by way of waistline-higher h2o all through a storm to photograph the location Irish Moments, an image which includes considering the fact that develop into emblematic in the intensity with the dispute. These actions weren't simply symbolic; they were meant to Obtain Visible evidence of your wall’s placement relative to tidal strains and guarded land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the positioning in the sea Irish Situations noted, describing how The 2 men entered the drinking water throughout critical weather conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading by way of storm water to photograph the positioning turned Among the most striking descriptions to emerge from courtroom reporting. The Irish Situations write-up about accountant Paul Feely observed that this kind of actions ended up cited to demonstrate the plaintiffs’ belief that the wall extended into a location afflicted by tidal movement, strengthening their argument that the SAC was currently being encroached on.
The situations at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 had been lined intimately because of the countrywide push. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Occasions 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Instances January 27 2026 grew to become commonly searched phrases as audience sought to understand the background and implications of the case. On that day, the High Court read further submissions on no matter whether interim orders really should be granted to halt design pending an entire Listening to. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a essential minute while in the authorized timeline.
With the core from the dispute is actually a disagreement above boundaries, organizing compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely preserve that the wall, as manufactured, goes further than what was authorised and intrudes into secured land. They argue that this is simply not a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by occupation, continues to be called meticulous in his evaluation of organizing documents, maps, and disorders connected towards the authorization.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have both equally stressed that their motion is determined by worry for environmental protection and adherence to planning law. They reject promises that the case is about preserving A personal check out, insisting instead that it's about ensuring that progress at Sutton Strand respects legal and ecological boundaries. In affidavits, they've explained their lengthy-standing link to the area and their recognition of its environmental sensitivity.
On the other aspect, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed them selves as a couple only attempting to produce a family members household in accordance Using the legislation. They deny the wall encroaches with a Unique Place of Conservation and say that every one functions are performed based on Skilled assistance and authorized strategies. Their attorneys have argued which the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and which the extraordinary steps of René Collier and Paul Feely, including entering the sea in the course of a storm, tend not to change the underlying information.
The case has also raised broader questions about how preparing disputes are resolved in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter court dispute more than construction of wall at coastal website is now a shorthand description to get a scenario that a lot of observers see as more and more typical. As sea ranges increase and coastal erosion intensifies, the exact delineation amongst personal land, public foreshore, and guarded habitats is now far more contentious.
The Irish Instances post about René Collier noted which the businessman had Beforehand been involved with neighborhood advocacy on preparing and environmental challenges, while not at this scale. Meanwhile, the Irish Situations report about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how folks from very unique Skilled backgrounds can discover on their own aligned in these types of disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some studies spell their names, have become synonymous While using the Sutton Strand situation.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the internet site from your sea Irish Situations coverage emphasised, underlining The bizarre lengths Accountant Paul Feely to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded as a result of waist-significant h2o in the course of a storm to photograph the internet site Irish Occasions and René Collier waded by midsection-higher drinking water all through a storm to photograph the site Irish Moments are phrases that appeared consistently in protection, reflecting each the Bodily fact with the coastline and the symbolic nature in the act. For supporters on the plaintiffs, these actions demonstrated motivation; for critics, they illustrated the things they see as an extreme technique.
As being the High Court proceedings continue, the outcome remains unsure. The court docket will have to determine whether the wall as built complies with preparing permission and whether or not any encroachment into a Unique Region of Conservation has occurred. The lawful arguments are complex, involving interpretation of maps, tidal data, and planning conditions. Nonetheless the human ingredient stays central: neighbours who have to Dwell alongside one another very long following the legal costs are actually paid out.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing in excess of building works at the internet site on Dublin Street, Sutton, nevertheless the implications of the situation prolong past that handle. For planners, developers, and people alike, the dispute serves being a reminder of the significance of clarity in scheduling permissions and sensitivity in coastal growth. Additionally, it underscores how immediately a local disagreement can escalate when elementary problems which include environmental safety and assets rights are perceived to get at stake.
Meanwhile, Sutton Strand remains an area of purely natural attractiveness and contested boundaries. The wall within the centre in the dispute stands partly crafted, a physical manifestation of unresolved legal inquiries. Whether it's going to in the long run be altered, removed, or finished as planned will depend upon the courtroom’s conclusions. Right until then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their variations will probably keep on to seem in headlines, connected indelibly to Among the most intently viewed planning disputes in north Dublin in recent years.